Very often the focus of any investor is on the returns and the choice of asset class. How often have we had a coffee machine chat with our colleague at the office about the fantastic new investment deal he did. The most often chatter is usually about the next multi bagger stock that has been identified. While the chatter around the stupendous profits from cryptos have died down in recent times, I am sure you would have been inundated with talks of the big profits that everyone earned.
While the choice of asset class and finding the multi baggers is important, an oft neglected factor is the time. Time is an important factor and nay I say an extremely important factor in the investment journey. It takes little intelligence or skill. And yet it is the one that most of us miss out on.
How many of us can confidently say that we made the best use of our investment opportunities in our twenties? Did you maximize your savings and investments when you were in your twenties? Just a handful will be able to say so. Most of us miss out on our best years; the early years of our productive life.
10,000 invested at an age of 25 is significantly more powerful than the 10,000 invested at the age of 35. I will illustrate this with an example below.
The simplest trick in the book is to invest aggressively in the early years and then sit tight for as long as required. You can watch my video about the Magic of Compounding here.
In order to understand the power of time, lets look at the illustration below. Now in order to understand the illustration we need to make a few assumptions. These are just assumptions and you can use your own assumptions and rebuild the illustration. But whichever way you look at it, the inference will be the same. That TIME is an extremely important factor in the investment process.
Let us assume the investment journey of 2 young people. Let us call them Jim and Jane.
Jim is a carefree soul. Always out to have a good time. He lives the high life in his early years. He doesn't have any savings and hence does not begin his investment journey until he turns 35. He begins investing at the age of 35 and continues investing monthly investments until he turns 60.
On the other hand, Jane is a lot focused on her savings and investments. She starts saving and investing her income as soon as she starts working at the age of 25. In other words she invests for 36 years until she turns 60.
In order to keep this calculation let us assume that each of them invests 1,000 per month during their investment process and both earn the same annual return of 12% pa. Of course these are plain assumptions and you can use your own.
If each of them invests 1000 per month and earns 12% per month, the below is the final output at the ends of their respective investment period. For the sake of simplicity, the below illustration assumes that the monthly investments are made in a lump-sum amount at the beginning of each year and that the return is compounded on an annual basis.
Now I understand you will already have many questions! Very valid ones. Wouldn't they be able to increase their monthly investments as they progress in their career? Is the rate of assumed rate of return as fair one?
As I mentioned the the illustration is based on simple assumptions. You may use different ones. But without fail the outcome will show you that the person who begins investing early ends up in a much stronger position at the end of the investment process.
So who would you want to be? Jim or Jane. Comment below and let me know your thoughts.